Я прошла на конференцию в Китае в конце лета.
Даже не так.
Я!!!
Прошла!!!
На международную конференцию!!!
В Китае!!!
Ложка дёгтя: одна из всего коллектива. Английский знаю на очень недостаточном уровне, в Москве при беседе с американцем я с трудом прослеживала общее направление разговора. А тут от меня потребуется не только быть готовой выступить (у меня постер), но и понять вопрос, и ответить.
Уже смирилась с тем, что не смогу поехать, но тут полезла смотреть отзывы. Чёрт. Это же успех.
Надо ехать.
Как быть?
Текст отзывов. Промпт вам в помощь----------------------- REVIEW 1 ---------------------
PAPER: 17
TITLE: Interview As Method Of Research Of Presence Effect Under Virtual Reality Environments
AUTHORS: Nataly Averbukh
----------- REVIEW -----------
The paper presents the author's work about sense of presence in virtual environments. The study used the personal interview to measure the sense of presence from the perspective of psychology. It is interesting and valuable to virtual reality research.
----------------------- REVIEW 2 ---------------------
PAPER: 17
TITLE: Interview As Method Of Research Of Presence Effect Under Virtual Reality Environments
AUTHORS: Nataly Averbukh
----------- REVIEW -----------
This paper describes the method of evaluating the effect of presence under certain virtual reality environment. The proposed method is an improvement of Presence Questionnair by Witmer and Singer. The research issue of evaluating presence effect is one of important research issues in virtual reality. The problem with this paper is that the description about the proposed improvement is not clear and therefore is not persuading enough. As this paper is a poster paper and this point will be clarified by the discussions between the author and the poster participants, it would be reasonable to accept this paper.
----------------------- REVIEW 3 ---------------------
PAPER: 17
TITLE: Interview As Method Of Research Of Presence Effect Under Virtual Reality Environments
AUTHORS: Nataly Averbukh
----------- REVIEW -----------
This poster introduces an interesting idea of using interview instead of questionnaire after the virtual reality test. The author believes the more elaborated and flexible method can be more faithful to the results and meaningful. After reading the poster, I am convinced that the way to question the testee may remain another interesting open research problem. Unfortunately, the author just raises the question, but does not provide any confirmed or primarily answers. Due to the lack of conclusion, I give this poster a marginal score, but I would strongly encourage the author to go further in that direction.